Hi I'm max,
a Master in Design for Emergent Futures student at the Institute for advanced Architecture of Catalonia. On this website, i will document my journey throughout the MDEF program.
As an overview of what i'm interested in, you can take a look at my design space.
In the first week, the main objective was to get to know the faculty, our co-students, and the area around IAAC.
To become familiar with the faculty, Guillem talked a lot about MDEF, the FabLab here as well as FabLabs all over the world, and projects of all sorts. Also, we got an overview of all the workshop areas the IAAC has to offer: 3D printing, CNC milling, laser cutting, woodworking, electronics, and robot arms, to name a few.
We were also welcomed with a spontaneous visit by Nadya Peek, who gave a presentation about “Making machines that make,” with a strong emphasis on concepts like open-source frameworks and democratizing access to digital fabrication, to immediately inspire us with awe and creativity.
In order to achieve the second goal, we had to bring some pictures of objects, a community, a background and a “more-than-human” aspect that influenced our live in some way and tell a few stories along those pictures.
Also we went out for some drinks.
Then, for the last objective, we took a leisurely stroll around Poblenou, visiting community workshops, community gardens, and community spaces for art & culture.
I don’t think I have ever seen so much community engagement in a single place.
A design space is a continuously updated mind-map to keep track of, organize and connect different topics that interest us within our design practice. The first draft of our own design spaces we made from pictures of several different objects, materials, reference projects, contexts and methodologies that interested us. By ourselves and in groups we found connections between the different topics.
Later, we extended, digitalized and added more items to our design spaces. A current version of my design space is live at the top of the page.
For me, the design space was probably the most helpful exercise that we have done up to this point. In the beginning it took me a while to understand what it was supposed to look like, so i struggled finding pictures at first, but i am very happy with the result.
Reflection 1
The first weeks at MDEF have already been a diverse, challenging, and perspective-broadening experience in many regards.
First of all, I am thoroughly happy with the people at the whole IAAC faculty. When I decided to come here, I imagined IAAC to be a place where people with open minds, a vision for a better future, and great technical skill come together, and I have not been disappointed. Additionally, my classmates at MDEF are much more than I could have hoped for, and I am excited to see what projects we are going to do together.
The first two weeks of classes at MDEF offered very new ways of thinking about design for me. The design space method helped me visualize, organize, and interconnect different fields of interest within my practice, and I have started to enjoy it as a complementary tool that will be changed and expanded alongside to reflect my own changes and developments throughout my education.
The number of communities and projects connected to IAAC was overwhelming at first, but I am excited to see what opportunities will arise from that during the program.
During these first weeks, we have had many introductory classes on hardware, electronics, and coding. Since this is probably the sub-field of design where I have the most experience, these classes are not too challenging for me, but I still feel like I can learn a lot. I have done some hardware hacking in the past, but never to the extent where I had a whole disused high-tech SLA printer to disassemble and then invent an entirely different functionality for the technical components. This is an awesome opportunity, and I am grateful to be able to participate in classes like these.
In class, we had to craft a quick prototype. We were supposed to take a past project from one of our classmates and then try to make a prototype around that topic.
Bélen had a project where she experimented with a fabric that could generate electricity when it was warm on one side and cold on the other.
In turn, I wanted to experiment with a way to wear this fabric in an unrestrictive fashion so that it could be worn over clothing and on different parts of the body.
I did my first 1PP intervention to figure out how much water I used in a day. It was a fun and interesting experience, and a good reason to finally buy a Tripod.
I learned that I used almost 77 liters on that friday which is a lot, but I think it must still be a lower than average day, since I didn't clean a lot of dishes nor did I do laundry.
Reflection 2
The last two weeks of MDEF felt very intense and a lot more draining than the first two. Maybe that’s just because I was a little sick, and it was hard for me to keep up.
Nevertheless, the design intervention was an interesting thing to do, and I want to see which other questions can be answered in this fashion. I am not entirely sure how scientifically useful I consider the information gathered in this way, but I can’t deny that I like the honesty of answering questions by taking action.
I very much liked the other content we were working with during these last two weeks. The Living with Your Own Ideas workshop was not what I expected, but I think it opened a new field of interest for me that I had not been aware of yet. I consider myself to be an open-minded person, but some of the ideas we were presented with are more profound, speculative, and progressive than anything I have encountered up until this point.
The Companion Species Manifesto, for example, presents a way of thinking about interspecies relations
that is entirely new to me, but it resonates deeply, and I am eager to read some of the book recommendations I received this week.
At first, it was hard for me to engage in the prosthesis we prototyped during the week. In the past, I needed a clear idea of what I wanted to achieve by building a prototype. The different prostheses we built during Living with Your Own Ideas had the goal of building something to experiment with the notion of self, encouraging a shift in one’s own perspective. I quite enjoyed this after I got over my initial difficulties.
The Machine Paradox workshop consisted of two intense weeks with our noses deep in electronics. In the first week, we disassembled, cataloged, and examined the internal workings of a discarded electronic device. In the second week, we reassembled the parts into a “Paradox machine” to give them a new life.
We started out by cleaning the dust off some items from a container full of discarded electronic machines.
Afterwards, we got together in groups, each group receiving one the scrapped devices. I worked together with Bélen, Flavio, Andrea and Ramon, and we decided to give our attentions to the beautiful Formlabs Form 1 SLA Printer.
To see a detailed documentation of our teardown and quest to examine and control the individual parts that make up the printer, you can take a look at the forensic report we wrote on the topic.
The second week we spent on assembling a useless machine. The goal was to use parts of the basic structure of the Formlabs, including the mechanism that detects when the cover is open for safety reasons, to make a machine that “parties” with itself while it is closed, but when it detects it was being opened, it would shut down, not allowing meagre humans to take part in its fun activities.
We couldn’t use the Barduino board, because the sensitive Galvo motors would react to the frequency of the PWM pulses and flicker about. Instead, we ended up with an Adafruit Feather ESP32-S3, which sports two Digital to Analog Converters (DAC).
The connector cables we accessed on the Galvo driver board have a Ground, Power and Signal Wire. With the DAC connected to the Signal wire of the Galvo board, we could control the position of the lasers on one quarter of the available space on the printer. Connecting the power of each of the Galvo controls shifts the lasers origin by 50% on the axis of the pertaining Galvo motor. In this fashion, all four quarters of the printing space can be reached with the laser by using the 4 combinations of powering or not powering the controls for each Galvo motor.
To center the laser as good as possible on the disco ball to achieve more reflections, we connected the power power wires through potentiometers. They regulate the voltage going to the Galvo driver board, allowing us to manually adjust the origin of the laser to an area directly under the disco ball.
In order to produce a continuous pattern that shoots the laser at different points at the discoball, we utilized a lissajous curve motion. For this we used code by pyeseul from p5.js.
The Reed Sensor inside the printer that detected wether the cover is closed or not seemed to work at first, but it gave out eventually, so we ended up replacing it with a Hall Sensor.
Controlling the Stepper with an H-Bridge to move the disco ball up and down to shake it a bit was fairly straight forward.
We couldn’t figure out how to communicate with the OLED screen that was built into the Form 1, so we substituted it for a simple LCD screen that was sufficient to display our two different messages depending on the state of the Printer: “party in progress…” for when the printer is closed, and “no humans allowed” for when it is open.
Here you can take a look at our final presentation of the project.
This workshop was a pretty intense experience. Taking apart a high-tec machine like the Formlabs has to be exciting of course, but using most of its parts to build another completely different machine was something I have never done before and enjoyed a lot.
The experience wasn’t only great because of the workshop concept, but also because of my classmates and teachers. Inside of my team, I felt that we were all eager to experiment and understand, motivated and most of the time we managed to share the work somewhat efficiently.
To watch the other groups develop their projects was very enjoyable as well and i am a big fan of the other useless machines.
The amount of teachers and their helpfulness, good moods and knowledge contributed greatly to the success of the workshop. With every question, doubt or idea I had, I feel like I always got very attentive support and I think I learned a lot.
Living with your own ideas was, at first, a little strange experience for me. I caught a cold the weekend before, so I missed the introduction and only attended half of the classes. In the part that I did participate in, Thomas Thwaites elaborated on some of his projects for us: building a terrible yet hilarious toaster from absolute scratch and living as a goat in the Swiss Alps for several days. Insane, ridiculous, and absolutely brilliant. Then we went on to read the Companion Species Manifesto by Donna Haraway. These concepts, or at least profoundly thinking about them, were entirely new to me.
With the prosthesis, especially the second one, I struggled a bit at first. Coming up with an idea that I like quickly is hard enough, but in the beginning, I also had my problems with seeing the purpose of these tasks. Only later, after having had some time to think, I started to like the topics that have been introduced in this workshop a lot. They presented to me a way of thinking that feels free and progressive, encouraging close examination and considering different perspectives, experimenting with identity and self-expression.
Prosthesis 1 - Becoming the best version of ourselves
I would not say I am a very lazy person, but I think few things are as hard for me as leaving the bed in the morning. However much I enjoy my life or not, the cozy warm bed always feels like the better option. Often I think about how much happier, more productive and downright better a person I were, if I could start every day with energy and ease. Hence, my prothesis shall provide that!
It’s a little chip that is injected under the skin. Every morning, like an alarm clock, it will pump an amount of adrenaline into my blood that would wake a gorilla.
Prosthesis 2 - Becoming something non-human
This was difficult at first, I think I have never wanted to be something non-human before.
My approach here was to get inspired by the considerable amount of e-waste that occupies most of our classroom. I just started crafting something from scraps I liked and thought about a story as I went.
I ended up with a device that would connect my brain to the consciousness of nature itself. I don’t know what that would mean, but it’s an experience I wouldn’t miss out on.
Part 3 - To judge & to be judged
This task consisted of two parts:
The subject role and the detective role. In the subject part, we would change our behavior or the way we looked with the help of a prosthesis.
As detectives, we would follow our subjects around, documenting their various actions and trying to figure out what they meant.
Subject
My goal was to leave my opinion on things that I see in my environment. With a simple dot vote consisting of green and red sticky dots, I could leave my approval on a pretty bike, a water fountain or my detective and likewise express dissatisfaction about giant burger king advertisement murals or trash on the street. Judgement comes in a lot of layers, and to be judged for judging something else is not an uncommon occurance.
Detective
I have never been someone who consciously thinks about how other people are feeling; from time to time I know intuitively. Focusing all my attention on figuring out what was going on in someone else’s head was an intense experience. However, my inexperience shows: the closest I came to understanding the reasons behind her behavior was the question, “Does her interaction with the thread reflect her moods?” which I wrote down during the observation.
I imagine that, for a more experienced observer, the conclusion would have been crystal clear. She rolled out the string in a controlled and orderly fashion while talking on the phone during a quiet moment on the roof, with only one other person. Later, in a larger conversation about MDEF topics, she tangled the thread into a messy jumble. She intended the string to represent the way her thoughts varied in different situations, visualizing her mind’s activity during different interactions.
It was hard for me to really empathize with Paula’s actions, as I often felt distracted by things she was doing that were outside my own experience. I didn’t know what she was working on, so I felt like I was missing an important component. I didn’t know whom she was talking to on the phone, or what the conversation was about, so I couldn’t make much sense of it. During her later conversation with our classmates, I felt disconnected in my role as a detective and didn’t want to participate in the conversation.
In conclusion, I realize I still have much to learn about what to focus on when trying to understand someone’s thoughts through observation. Still, I found the experience very insightful, and I think I’d like to incorporate this practice more into my own approach.
About me
Hi! I am Your name. I am an art director & graphic designer based in New York City working on branding, visual identities, editorial design and web design.
Previous work
I'm a paragraph. Edit the page on Gitlab to add your own text and edit me. I’m a great place for you to tell a story and let your users know a little more about you.
Project A
Talking about a specific project I am proud of.